Bottom line: if people weren't doped up over their eye balls with consciousness reducing, brain damaging drugs, if they weren't told depressing, demoralizing and pacifying lies about a chronic, biological brain disease, but encouraged to look for the existential, spiritual meaning of their personal crisis, there'd be a lot more than 19% who'd recover fully. It's still a long way from these 19% to the 85% of alternatives like Soteria.
Merete Nordentoft wants the period people are "treated" under the OPUS project to be extended from two to five years. Half of the participants in the study were "treated" under OPUS during the first couple of years. The article doesn't say anything about these participants doing better than the other half, on the contrary: "We don't know to what extent the prognosis depends on the treatment, even if some individuals certainly have improved thanks to the treatment." -Merete Nordentoft, in perfect self-contradiction, as well as in perfect contradiction to her own research results.
I'd say, what we'd really need isn't more OPUS, but to have the Danish Fuller Torreys (yes, Merete Nordentoft really believes there's something to Fuller Torrey's cat poop nonsense... ) replaced by Loren Moshers. The whole incompetent (they can't even interpret their own research results) bunch of them. Merete first.
_______________
Related: "New Danish research shows that 'schizophrenics' do better off drugs"
"More about Merete Nordentoft's surprising (NOT!) research results on 'schizophrenia'"
Wednesday, 17 March 2010
Bye bye, Merete! - Some final thoughts about Merete Nordentoft's study on "schizophrenia" outcomes
Labels:
alternatives,
brain damage,
junk science,
Loren Mosher,
neuroleptics,
recovery,
Soteria
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment